The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) has formally called on the UK Government to reduce VAT for hospitality and leisure businesses from the standard 20% to 5%, permanently. The body argues that labour-intensive sectors, cafés, restaurants, hotels, pubs, leisure venues, are carrying a tax burden that is structurally incompatible with the margins those businesses can actually generate. That is a polite way of saying the current rate is quietly killing them.
Scotland's hospitality sector is not abstract collateral in this argument. According to figures from UKHospitality Scotland, the industry supports around 220,000 jobs and contributes over £6 billion to the Scottish economy annually. Those numbers have been under sustained pressure since 2022, squeezed between energy costs, wage inflation following successive National Living Wage increases, and consumer spending that has simply not recovered to pre-pandemic levels. The sector is, in the language of accountancy, structurally distressed.
The ACCA's case is simple and arithmetically clean. VAT at 20% applies to the full sales price. Labour costs are not deductible against it. So a café owner paying more in wages, energy, and ingredients is still handing over a fifth of every pound taken at the till before they see a penny of margin. The UK rate is among the highest in Europe for this sector; France, Germany, and Ireland all operate reduced VAT rates for hospitality. Ireland's decision to temporarily cut the rate to 9% during the pandemic was credited with saving tens of thousands of jobs across the sector, according to research published by the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin.
Westminster's counterargument has always been revenue. A permanent 5% hospitality VAT rate would cost the Treasury billions in foregone income. But ACCA and others, including the Scottish Hospitality Group, have consistently pushed back on that framing: a sector with more viable businesses pays more employment taxes, business rates, and corporation tax over time. The short-term revenue cost is offset by not having to fund the unemployment and business failure that high VAT accelerates. That is the macro case. At the individual business level, a 15-percentage-point VAT reduction on a £400,000 annual turnover is the difference between closing and continuing.
Scotland has limited direct levers here, VAT remains reserved to Westminster, which is precisely why this campaign matters at a UK level, and precisely why Scottish operators need to be visible in it. The Scottish Government has used its devolved powers where it can: the Small Business Bonus Scheme provides rates relief to qualifying businesses, and Visit Scotland continues to invest in tourism promotion. But without movement on VAT, those interventions are managing decline rather than reversing it. Scottish Hospitality Group and trade bodies including UKHospitality Scotland are actively lobbying; independent operators who add their voices to that pressure, directly, via their MPs and MSPs, are not wasting their time.
