The UK Government has committed to raising defence expenditure to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, a figure that represents tens of billions of additional pounds flowing into procurement, infrastructure, and supply chains. Scotland, home to Babcock's Rosyth shipyard, Leonardo's Edinburgh facility, and a dense cluster of aerospace and electronics SMEs, is positioned to take a meaningful share of that. The Scottish Government has estimated the country could attract over £1 billion in additional defence-related economic activity if it plays its hand well. The catch: there are not enough trained people to deliver it.
According to analysis from the Defence and Security Accelerator and industry bodies including ADS Scotland, the sector is already running short on systems engineers, cyber specialists, sovereign electronics talent, and advanced manufacturing technicians. These are not roles that can be filled from a general jobseeker pool. They require years of specialist training, security clearance, and in many cases, experience working within highly regulated supply chains. The pipeline of people with those credentials is thin, and it has been thinning for the better part of a decade.
The Scottish Government's own skills planning body, Skills Development Scotland, has flagged STEM shortfalls in engineering and digital disciplines as a structural problem requiring multi-year investment. Highlands and Islands Enterprise has separately noted that remote defence-adjacent sectors, particularly those tied to maritime and energy infrastructure, face compounding recruitment challenges when competing against central-belt employers for the same narrow talent pool. The skills gap is not a projection. It is already affecting contract bids and project timelines.
What makes this particularly frustrating for Scottish SMEs is the timing. NATO member states are accelerating procurement. The Ministry of Defence is under political pressure to demonstrate sovereign capability and spend closer to home. Scotland's shipbuilding, space, and cyber credentials are genuinely competitive. But contracts that require rapid workforce scale-up are going to firms that can demonstrate capacity on paper, right now, during the tender process. If a Scottish SME cannot show it has the headcount or the training plan, it loses the bid to a larger English or Welsh firm that can, even if the Scottish firm is technically superior.
There are levers available. Scottish Enterprise runs several workforce development programmes with grant support attached, and Business Gateway advisers can point SMEs toward the Flexible Workforce Development Fund, which lets employers use levy funding for training through Scotland's colleges. The Tay Cities and Glasgow City Region deals both have defence-sector skills components worth examining. And at a policy level, there is a serious argument that Scotland should be pressing Westminster harder for a sovereign skills strategy tied to the defence dividend, rather than allowing UK-wide spending commitments to default to wherever the workforce already exists. Following the money here is not complicated: the firms that invest in training pipelines now, in 2025 and 2026, will be the ones holding the contracts in 2028.
